1960 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Wrangler. (281 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 489 kg more than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Aston Martin | Jeep |
Model | DBR2 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1759 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1801 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2423 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 70 L |