1960 Austin 7 vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 1960 Austin 7 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Buick 40 (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 1025 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 1952 Buick 40 | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | 7 | 40 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 292 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 78.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 104.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3090 mm |