1960 Austin 7 vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 1960 Austin 7 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Holden FX (51 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 360 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | 7 | FX |
Year Released | 1960 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 60 Nm | 136 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2620 mm |