1960 Austin 7 vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 1960 Austin 7 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 989 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
| Make | Austin | Hudson |
| Model | 7 | Super Wasp |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 349 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 90.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 111.1 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1599 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 75 L |
