1960 Austin 7 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1964 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1510 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | 7 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 7027 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 2120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 79 L |
