1960 Austin 7 vs. 1965 Bristol 408
To start off, 1965 Bristol 408 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 5,130 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Bristol 408 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Bristol 408 weights approximately 975 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Bristol 408 (464 Nm) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 1965 Bristol 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 1965 Bristol 408 | |
Make | Austin | Bristol |
Model | 7 | 408 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 5130 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 464 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 98.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 84.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 81 L |