1960 Austin 7 vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 1965 Volvo 220 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Volvo 220 (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Volvo 220 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Volvo 220 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Volvo 220 (144 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 1965 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | 7 | 220 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 144 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 45 L |