1960 Austin 7 vs. 1970 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1970 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,427 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Nissan Bluebird (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 320 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Nissan Bluebird (116 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 1970 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 1970 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | 7 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1427 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2430 mm |
