1960 Austin 7 vs. 1982 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1982 Ford Falcon is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Falcon (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Falcon weights approximately 760 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Falcon (228 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 1982 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 1982 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 7 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1960 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3271 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 228 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2830 mm |