1960 Austin 7 vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 255 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (115 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 1982 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | 7 | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2420 mm |
