1960 Austin 7 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Zastava 102 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 102 (95 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 1982 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | 7 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2160 mm |
