1960 Austin 7 vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 1995 Rover 200 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 200 weights approximately 575 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (233 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Austin | Rover |
Model | 7 | 200 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 233 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |