1960 Austin 7 vs. 1996 Toyota Picnic
To start off, 1996 Toyota Picnic is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,988 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Picnic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Picnic (127 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Picnic should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Picnic weights approximately 725 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Picnic (181 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 1996 Toyota Picnic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 1996 Toyota Picnic | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 7 | Picnic |
Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 181 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 70 L |