1960 Austin 7 vs. 1997 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 1997 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Wrangler (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 840 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jeep Wrangler (280 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 1997 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 1997 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | 7 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1960 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 280 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2380 mm |