1960 Austin 7 vs. 2000 BMW 320
To start off, 2000 BMW 320 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 320 (168 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 320 weights approximately 985 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 320 (214 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2000 BMW 320 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | 7 | 320 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 214 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1595 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 63 L |