1960 Austin 7 vs. 2000 Citroen Xsara
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 524 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (147 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 2000 Citroen Xsara | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | 7 | Xsara |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 82 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2550 mm |
