1960 Austin 7 vs. 2000 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 2000 Pontiac Bonneville is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,785 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pontiac Bonneville (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pontiac Bonneville should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 990 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Pontiac Bonneville (379 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2000 Pontiac Bonneville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2000 Pontiac Bonneville | |
Make | Austin | Pontiac |
Model | 7 | Bonneville |
Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3785 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 379 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 96.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 86.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 54 L |