1960 Austin 7 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 803 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | 7 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 271 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1413 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 68 L |