1960 Austin 7 vs. 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1490 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | 7 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 4157 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 374 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 71 L |