1960 Austin 7 vs. 2002 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (149 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 842 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (226 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2002 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 2002 Chrysler Sebring | |
| Make | Austin | Chrysler |
| Model | 7 | Sebring |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 2343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 87.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 101 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1452 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 61 L |
