1960 Austin 7 vs. 2002 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 780 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2002 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2002 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 7 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 220 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 61 L |