1960 Austin 7 vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz C (141 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 975 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz C (220 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2002 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 7 | C |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 85 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 62 L |