1960 Austin 7 vs. 2002 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2002 Skoda Fabia is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,420 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Skoda Fabia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Skoda Fabia (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Fabia should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Skoda Fabia weights approximately 460 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Skoda Fabia (126 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2002 Skoda Fabia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2002 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Austin | Skoda |
Model | 7 | Fabia |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1420 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 126 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 75.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 45 L |