1960 Austin 7 vs. 2003 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Seville is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac Seville (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 1196 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac Seville (407 Nm) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2003 Cadillac Seville | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | 7 | Seville |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 407 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1806 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 70 L |