1960 Austin 7 vs. 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager (142 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager (218 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | 7 | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 218 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 101 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1765 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 87 L |