1960 Austin 7 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (181 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 7 | 6 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 83.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 64 L |