1960 Austin 7 vs. 2003 Panoz Esperante
To start off, 2003 Panoz Esperante is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Panoz Esperante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Panoz Esperante (318 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Panoz Esperante should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Panoz Esperante weights approximately 660 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Panoz Esperante (426 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2003 Panoz Esperante will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2003 Panoz Esperante | |
Make | Austin | Panoz |
Model | 7 | Esperante |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 426 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 59 L |