1960 Austin 7 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 410 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (146 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 2004 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 7 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 84.8 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 47 L |
