1960 Austin 7 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (188 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1406 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | 7 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 3376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 188 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 82 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 2016 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 100 L |
