1960 Austin 7 vs. 2005 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 737 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo (145 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2005 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2005 Daewoo Rezzo | |
Make | Austin | Daewoo |
Model | 7 | Rezzo |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1347 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 60 L |