1960 Austin 7 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 701 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (252 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 7 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 252 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 80 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1311 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 64 L |