1960 Austin 7 vs. 2005 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2005 Nissan 350Z is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan 350Z (283 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 920 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan 350Z (354 Nm) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2005 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | 7 | 350Z |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 354 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 81.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 80 L |