1960 Austin 7 vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,522 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1733 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (339 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | 7 | Charger |
Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 2343 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 68 L |