1960 Austin 7 vs. 2006 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,699 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1421 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (307 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2006 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | 7 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 307 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 90.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 2031 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 78 L |