1960 Austin 7 vs. 2007 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJ is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJ (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1074 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJ (420 Nm) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2007 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2007 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | 7 | XJ |
Year Released | 1960 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 420 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1684 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 85 L |