1960 Austin 7 vs. 2008 Chrysler Aspen
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Aspen (303 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Aspen weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Aspen (447 Nm) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2008 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2008 Chrysler Aspen | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | 7 | Aspen |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 303 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 447 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 102 L |