1960 Austin 7 vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (271 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 719 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 7 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 370 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 76 L |