1960 Austin 7 vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 945 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander (232 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | 7 | Outlander |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 232 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 97 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 60 L |