1960 Austin 7 vs. 2008 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2008 Nissan Navara is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Navara (172 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Navara should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Navara weights approximately 1422 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Navara (403 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan Navara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2008 Nissan Navara | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | 7 | Navara |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 403 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 2032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 80 L |