1960 Austin 7 vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 1025 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | 7 | BLS |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 365 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 89.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 58 L |
