1960 Austin 7 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 509 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm) has 490 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 2009 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | 7 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 6162 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 550 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 68 L |
