1960 Austin 7 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-7 weights approximately 719 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 7 | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 69 L |