1960 Austin 7 vs. 2009 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 515 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda Tribute (184 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2009 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 7 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 184 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 57 L |