1960 Austin 7 vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 287 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 1202 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (427 Nm) has 367 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | 7 | STS |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 427 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1812 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2957 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 64 L |