1960 Austin 7 vs. 2011 Ford E-350
To start off, 2011 Ford E-350 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-350 weights approximately 2220 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-350 (474 Nm) has 414 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2011 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2011 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 7 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 474 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 125 L |