1960 Austin 7 vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,247 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ka (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Ka weights approximately 445 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Ka (145 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2012 Ford Ka | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 7 | Ka |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 35 L |