1960 Austin 7 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi RVR
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi RVR is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi RVR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi RVR (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi RVR should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi RVR weights approximately 765 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi RVR (196 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2012 Mitsubishi RVR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2012 Mitsubishi RVR | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | 7 | RVR |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 196 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4295 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 63 L |