1960 Austin 7 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1343 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | 7 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1953 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 68 L |
