1960 Austin 7 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 364 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 2082 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm) has 505 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | 7 | ESCALADE |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 397 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 565 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 92 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 2692 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5639 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1892 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3302 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 117 L |
