1960 Austin 7 vs. 2013 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2013 Jeep Patriot is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Patriot (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Patriot weights approximately 801 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Patriot (224 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Patriot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2013 Jeep Patriot | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | 7 | Patriot |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 224 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 97 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1411 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1664 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 51 L |